SEMMY Finalist in ‘Local Search’

By: Lucy Langdon

A quick update and a polite request following on from my Four SEMMYs and a Silence post last week.

Quick Update

I got through to the finals- vote for me here! Thanks very much to the judging panel. I feel honoured to be listed among such high quality bloggers. This is the post I was nominated for- it’s an interview with five search marketing experts from around the world. Really, the kudos should go to them for their excellent answers.

Polite Request

Please vote for my post by clicking on the image below and choosing my entry. I’d really like to win :) . Thank you.

2009 SEMMY Finalist

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

The Problem with Google’s Broad (Advanced) Match Keywords

By: Rich

I just read a very interesting blog post from the Rimm-Kaufman Group about the changes that Google had made to Broad match keywords and the resulting effects. In the article they point out how the performance of broad match terms has gone down and that they have been noticing some troubling incidences where the broad match ads have been appearing when better and more closely matching keywords (and therefore adverts) have been available.

They believe that this started happening with the change to a ‘1st page bid’ rather than a minimum bid, Google is ignoring/not seeing some of the more exact terms with lower bids and is instead posting the broad match adverts. This idea certainly tallies with what I have been seeing in my analytics; looking at the actual search queries for broad match terms has thrown up example after example where there was a better matching keyword and ad group for the search. The result of this is that we, the advertisers, do not get the most suitable advert appearing for the viewer, Google have less relevant search results and that in turn will make the search less efficient for the consumer. google Hopefully with Google now aware of this problem a solution will be forthcoming before too long and broad match will no longer cannibalise other keywords’ traffic. In the meantime it means adding a lot of negative keywords to keep the boundaries up between ad groups. Perhaps we can use this as an opportunity to ask Google for some areas we would like improvements made such as;

  • Separate broad and advanced match types where broad match would act more like the old version.
  • Allow bidding on the Search Partners network on its own. Although in the UK the Search partners rarely seem to work as well as the main Search network, if given the chance to work on this traffic with independent bids then perhaps more value could be taken from it.
  • Ad serving where ‘optimise’ would favour the best converting advert based on statistical significance rather than the best CTR.
  • Search Query Reports without ‘other unique queries’.
  • More flexible version of the conversion optimiser with more parameters when setting CPA.

In the long term if Google gives us greater control over how and to whom we advertise then adverts will be more relevant to the searches, campaigns will become more profitable, PPC budgets will go up and Google would be the ultimate beneficiary.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

Social Media Impersonation

By: Will Critchlow

I have recently seen a number of well-known people on twitter being impersonated by people who set up cheeky accounts with:

  • the same profile picture
  • the same full name
  • the same username ending with an underscore (username_)

When you get an email saying they are following you, it comes in the form of “Full name is now following you on twitter” which definitely gets you clicking through if it’s someone you know well (online or offline).

There is little you can do to protect yourself of this in advance (though Twitter should definitely get on it!). It’s pretty insidious because if the most recent things the false account has said are plausible, many people are likely to be taken in and once they’ve been taken in, any kind of message could be sent to them (commercial, abusive, reputation-damaging, to name but a few). At this point, it would be hard to prove it wasn’t you.

So what can you do about it?

Well first off, everyone using social media should be aware that it can happen. Be aware that profiles can be created by anyone - it sounds stupid, but until you are sure who is behind an account, you’re not sure. Mmkay?

But here’s my not-quite-foolproof list of actions to take to minimise the risk:

  • You can make your followers aware that you list your official profiles somewhere and that if a profile isn’t on that list, they should assume it’s not you (I’m guilty of not having done this yet, but I intend to)
  • Make sure you monitor for your name and your handle so you are the first to know if it happens (e.g. in my case “Will Critchlow” and “willcritchlow”). You can use, um, I don’t know an online monitoring tool or something
  • If you do find an abuse of the system, report it not only to your followers, but also to the social media site itself
  • Ask your friends to publicise the fact that you are being impersonated if it happens
  • Periodically point your followers to posts like this to remind everyone to be careful when playing in social media :)

For the record, this is me on twitter!.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

The Five Second Test usability tool

By: Leonie

The five second test is a simple usability test that helps you measure the effectiveness of your user interfaces.  Distilled have been using this tool to discover what users notice most about our website.  

The tool works by flashing up a screen shot of the particular web page for 5 seconds-(can you see where they got their name from)?  After the page is viewed a form appears which has five spaces for the user to simply list the things they remember.

Some people used these spaces to list the things they remembered, others to give in-depth advice or constructive criticism and others to simply offer up random abuse … nice.

If you are a loyal subject of Distilled, you many have noticed that we have been implementing some minor changes to the Distilled ‘Home’ and ‘Contact’ page recently. These changes were spurred on as a result of the the interesting things people had said in our test. 

Just a few months of using the tool gathered a considerable amount of data for both pages. We then set about analysing the findings to try and discover how these pages could be improved.

Home Page:

Below is what the Distilled home page looked like when it was being tested.

The home page design we tested old-home-page

For this page we received lots of positive feedback and a few suggestions. These regarded the unusual right hand positioning of the logo and the continuation of our brand colours further down the page.

The feedback also highlighted a lot of repetition in people’s responses. This is a good sign because it means a lot of people were noticing the right things. I have collated my findings in a bar graph in order to make differences in figures more readily recognisable. At this point 31 people have taken the test.

A Bar Graph of our findings home-page-graph1

Bar graph Analysis - The graph shows clearly that people are drawn to the call-to-action buttons. This is great; they are achieving their purpose. SEO has been noted more than the other services we offer. One theory I have about this is that usability testing tools fit closely with optimising websites, so it’s natural that more people who are aware of SEO will be taking the test. SEO is certainly not designed to stand out any more than the other service call-to-actions. 

The unusual right-hand positioning of the logo caused some comment. The right hand alignment of most of the elements within the logo led to this positioning initially.  As the amount of services Distilled offers increased the menu was forced to split awkwardly in two halves; the new design has solved both the logo and menu problem, whilst allowing space for any more services should Distilled expand its talents further.

The new design also continues the Distilled colours further down the page, therefore continuing the brand and highlighting more clearly what we do as a company at the top of the website.

The amended design:

distilled-new-home-page1


The Contact Page:

The contact page design we tested contact-old

The contact page received an extensive amount of feedback in one particular area: the RSS feed. This made it explicitly clear what needed to change. Below are the feedback messages from a few people regarding the RSS feed: 

  • too large RSS feed
  • GIANT rss button
  • RSS button again
  • RSS RSS RSS OKAY!?
  • giant rss feed icon
  • Gigantic RSS icon
  • Huge Contact Us Button
  • Not enough content to make me want to click on either huge thing.

So it was clear people found both the RSS feed and the ‘contact us’ button overly large.  

The amended design:

Both call to action buttons have been made smaller and more content has been included next to the RSS feed. Hopefully, this content will help to make people trust the icon and want to click on it more.

distilled-new-contact-page


One of the downsides of the ‘Five Second Test’ is the minimal amount of information that is received. It is certainly not the best tool if you are after detailed explanations of peoples’ thoughts.  If, however, you are looking for just sheer numbers to analyse then this tool is great; it soon becomes clear after just a few feedback responses what people are noticing most frequently and consequently what they are most likely to click on.

If one of the main elements of your website is not noticed you will need to reconsider this element until it starts to show up in the feedback.  Key points to look for in your feedback are:

Do people know what your company is called? Do they notice your logo? Is it clear what you do? Are your Call-to-actions noticed?

The five second test is definitely a tool worth trying out.

Distilled will continue to use this tool in an effort to ensure our website stays user friendly and easily accessible. 

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

Four SEMMY*’s And A Silence (with an 4 x award nominated cast)

By: Lucy Langdon

movie-poster2

PREMISE

An intrepid troupe of online adventurers journey through the Internet in search of search engine success, linkjuice love and traffic satisfaction.

CAST

Bill Murray : Will Critchlow (Director of Distilled)
Woody Allen : Duncan Morris (Director of Distilled)
Brad Pitt : Tom Critchlow (Head of Search)
Angelina Jolie : Lucy Langdon (Search Marketer)
Philip Seymour Hoffman : Rob Ousbey (Search Marketer)
Lisa Edelstien : Leonie Wharton (Designer)

Screenplay Excerpt

Act Two, Scene One

[Lucy is sitting behind her beautiful Mac. Will pokes his head round the corner]
Will: Mumble mumble mumble…
[Lucy removes her headphones]
Lucy: Sorry boss, what’s that?
Will: Did you see you’ve been nominated for a SEMMY?
Lucy: Way?
Will: Way, for your geo-location interview. Leonie has too.
[Leonie sticks her head out from behind her monitor]
Leonie: What’s that boss?
Will: [louder] You’ve been nominated for a SEMMY. For your blog post on the future of web design.
[Enter Tom, stage right, drop lighting to 'atmospheric'. He's eating an oatcake]
Tom: A SEMMY hey? Yeah, I got nominated last year… didn’t win…
[Meanwhile, Rob's been silently tapping away, as is his way]
Rob: [with a giddy edge of ginger excitement] Wait a second…. Tom, you’ve been nominated too. For your ‘I can’t believe it’s not blackhat‘ post.
Tom: [a small whimper of glee escapes]
Rob: And Will! Lessons in Monstering!
[By this time, all cast are on their feet and gathered together... a small voice pipes up]
Duncan: What about me?
[Silence. Thunder rolls in the distance.]

====== Close======
*nominations

No animals were harmed in the making of this production, and Duncan’s had a cup of tea and is feeling much better.

Credits (in order of appearance)

Will Critchlow- Google
Lucy Langdon- Local Search
Leonie Wharton-Design and Usability
Tom Critchlow- Link Building


Theatrical humour aside, we’re all VERY grateful- thank you very much for the nominations. Please vote for us if we make it through to the finalists!

2009 SEMMY Nominee

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

Inspiration away from the computer

By: Leonie

Hello, I am Leonie the designer here at Distilled, I wanted to share how I gather inspiration at the beginning of a project, and also to ask how you get yours.

There is only so much inspiration I can gather from staring at my computer screen. Sometimes I hit a wall and it becomes clear that a change needs to happen. This post will explain my solution to these mental blocks.

Working on a computer is great when you already have an idea; it helps as a tool to bring my ideas to life. The problem is getting the idea in the first place.

To elaborate, I see the computer as a constraint at the beginning of a project. This is because I often end up thinking of how I can design something as opposed to focusing on what the idea is. Thinking in this way hinders my trail of thought and crushes fragile ideas before they have properly evolved. Creativity should happen before the media decision is made.

For me the solution is to step as far away from the computer as possible. This involves:

  • looking in books
  • visiting fabric shops
  • visiting second hand shops
  • cycling through parks
  • drawing massive mind maps on paper, using thick pens
  • going to museums and galleries.

To simplify, my solution is to:

  • Look at things in 3D not 2D
  • Create something by hand
  • Move about – not sit still
  • Talk to people - not sit silently
  • Make happy mistakes that can not be fixed by pressing apple z!

How it works

Stepping away from the computer helps me in various ways. For example, I can draw lines that are not curved perfectly using vector software. I can position, move, align and rotate without the precision of all 360 degrees and I can select colours without a colour pallet.

Textures are often recreated for the web, but can end up looking fake. Capturing textures in their natural state can make for a much more realistic effect.

Still not convinced? Here are 2 examples of my plan in action:

Case Study 1

I recently designed a website for a Supermodel. To gather inspiration initially I went fabric shopping. Sifting through fabric samples ribbons and lace helped me to ask different questions.

The feel I was looking to emulate had soft muted feminine tones, peach and cream, these colours alone were not enough it needed more depth, a texture to refine the idea… then standing tall and proud a massive roll of the most fantastic fabric, this was finally it! The fabric was a pale pinky peach and was soft and silky, its floral pattern was subtle and the light really highlighted the curves of the leaves and petals.

Now that my ideas had reached a happy place it was time to consider how this pattern would work on screen.

Case Study 2

I also stepped away from the computer recently when designing a blog layout.

I began by using paper as blocks of colour, (as apposed to on screen colour) this helped me to question the blog template and also provided a different sort of dimension between the paper layers.

After this initial idea, I always kept the functionality of the blog in mind throughout the design process. For example, not making the header section too wide to maximise the amount of information that could be viewed above the fold. I also considered the width of the main and side column to ensure there would be enough space for the content. Now that the layout was finished I went back to the computer to complete the design.

To summarise

It is important to ensure that in the initial design phases the computer doesn’t stifle the design process. Fancy effects and ease of manipulation tempt designers to head straight for the computer without initially contemplating the concept.

Another benefit of creating elements by hand before they are brought on to the computer is that humans naturally prefer realism, natural fibres real shadows, these elements are more believable, shadows created by a real light source as apposed to a applying a drop shadow affect.

Handmade design inspires creative thinking. For me, combining this with the digital field opens up the design process so much more.

I think that the two simple case studies here prove that different methods of gathering inspiration can really help generate that initial spark.

What do you find helps inspire you?

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

Community Building Insights: An Interview with Martin Reed

By: Lucy Langdon

martin-reedMartin Reed is an online community builder who got in touch with us recently. He’s been in the industry for quite a while now and started his latest community, aimed at women and called Female Forum, last year. His blog, Community Spark, is a mine of information and intelligent discussion on the subject.

He kindly agreed to an interview and has some great insights and practical advice for anyone interested in the art of online communities. In particular, I like his closing advice about building relationships online: be honest, professional and generous. If you like this interview and want more, check out our interview with Rich Millington from Feverbee.

1. Please introduce yourself. Any hobbies or habits we should know about?

Well, my name is Martin Reed, I am 28 years old and have been developing online communities for about nine years. They have become a real passion of mine – I love the unpredictability of online community development and the fact that there is no ‘right way’ to develop them. Every community is different (or at least it should be) which keeps things interesting!

I love to travel; I am originally from the UK but now live in New York City with my American wife. I have also lived and worked in Australia and Canada. In 2006 I ran the London Marathon and raised around $2,000 for charity – a real buzz.

2. How did you get into the area of building communities?

It was a complete accident! I got my own Internet connection in 1999 and found online chat rooms absolutely fascinating. The fact I could communicate with someone on the other side of the world in realtime floored me. I began to get frustrated however, with all the chat sites that made you register just to gain access so I started up my own website, Just Chat as a place where people could chat without registering. The site is still going strong to this day, although it now has the addition of message boards, a free email penpals section and free ecards.

3. How would you describe your role as a ‘community builder’?

A community builder is someone who facilitates the development of relationships. It is all too easy to forget that behind every successful online community are real life people. All too often community builders focus on technology and advertising to bring in new members. This is a mistake – your focus should be on developing relationships amongst your existing members. If you build a successful community, your members will do the majority of your external promotion – free of charge.

4. Give us your favourite example of a successful online community? Actually, how do you define a ’successful community’?

I don’t think there is a universal determinant of what makes a successful online community. Every online community should be unique and have its own goals. Some may want to reach 1,000 members. Others may want to reach 500,000 forum posts. Some may want to develop a community with engaging discussion and mature, friendly members. This raises another important issue when it comes to developing online communities – measuring success with numbers isn’t appropriate. You might have 100,000 posts but they might be full of abuse – is that a sign of success? On the other hand you may only have 100 members but they are creating valuable content and representing everything good about your community. Harder to measure, but I would take the second scenario over the first every time.

I would have to include my own community, Female Forum as an example of a successful community. The site only launched in September, yet is has exceeded the goals I had in place for it for the first three months. We have a great bunch of members who have struck up real friendships with people that were once strangers. I can’t think of any job better than community building – bringing people together is an amazing feeling.

5. How did you decide Female Forum was where you wanted to go next? Was there a gap in the market or is it something you were really interested in?

I am passionate about online communities. Although I recommend people who are thinking about launching an online community to only develop one based on something they are passionate about, for me the subject doesn’t matter.

I wanted to give myself a big new challenge and develop a new online community from scratch. When I develop online communities, I want to do something different. There is no point setting up a ‘cookie cutter’ online community that is no different to those that already exist. It took me a few months to find a niche that I thought would be worth pursuing – namely an online community for women.

It seemed that the existing websites that catered solely for women were overly complex. The community features tended to be hidden away and unintuitive. I thought I could do better. Sure, I am a man – but developing and facilitating relationships is basically the same regardless of your audience.

I have written more about the development of Female Forum on my blog, Community Spark.

6. How big a team do you need behind you to operate a successful community?

It depends. When you start, you can realistically operate a successful community completely by yourself. It’s hard work, but it can be done. As your community grows, you will need additional help to prevent chaos and potential anarchy – that’s when you bring in your most valuable members who will often be more than happy to help moderate the community and alleviate your workload.

7. It seems you’re one of the only active men on Female Forum- do you want this to change over time or are you hoping the community will stay all female?

This is something I have been thinking about over the past couple of weeks. We had one man join a couple of months ago as he wanted advice from a female audience. At the time, we let him join and post his question. We are a little further down the line with the development of Female Forum now, so I need to ask my members what they think.

Personally, I don’t have a problem with a handful of men joining the community, however I can perfectly understand and would be willing to accept my members telling me they don’t want this to happen.

I only want change if my members want it, too.

8.1 The different stages of an online community: How do you attract and keep the early users when there are only a few posts per day?

Getting a brand new online community moving is extremely challenging. You shouldn’t launch an online community until you already have members. I know that sounds odd, but I’ll explain.

When you are developing your community, you need to already be looking for members. You should have a splash page up at your URL outlining what the community will offer. You should also allow people to register for updates. Over the development period, this should give you a number of potential new members – give them a sneak peek of the site before anyone else. Make them feel special and honoured. Involve them in your plans and make them feel like influencers, and they may just turn into them.

If you have friends that may be interested in the community, bring them in to help get the forum off the ground. If there are only a few posts per day, you need to step in and create content yourself. If you don’t create content, you wont create members, and you won’t develop relationships. People won’t join a community without content. They won’t stick around if there isn’t fresh content, either. Work hard, create content, make the members you have feel valued and you’ll get there.

8.2 Do you pursue or avoid creating the ‘in crowd’ (with lots of ‘in jokes’) that can appear as the community grows?

‘In Jokes’ shouldn’t be discouraged. They bring your community together. At the same time, you want your community to be open and inviting to new members. You can strike a balance – you just need to lead by example. Every now and then, be cheeky. One of my members on Female Forum loves reading The Daily Mail (a British tabloid newspaper) and is always mentioning specific stories. I started a poll asking other members if we should ban her from ever reading the newspaper again. Most came out in support of her – they saw the humour. Sure, it was silly but members loved it. Now, whenever this member mentions a story from that newspaper, it puts a cheeky grin on the faces of a number of members as they picture me cringing in the background after my motion was ‘defeated’.

At the same time, I also welcome new members publicly. This prompts other members to do the same. I have even designated some of the community’s strongest members as ‘Welcome Reps’ who have the specific job of making new members feel welcome.

8.3 What about the challenges of the big successes; how do you deal with spam and troublesome users?

Spam will always be a problem. I think I was dealing with spam on Female Forum pretty much from day one. You need to be vigilant, and you need to deal with it. If you leave spam on your community, you are sending the wrong message to your members and new visitors alike. You need to incorporate as many automated spam protection features as possible, but at the same time keep the community as accessible as possible. It’s a challenge.

You’ll also come across members that aren’t particularly pleasant. Your online community needs to have rules/guidelines so your members know how they are expected to behave. You can’t expect your members to refrain from certain behaviour if they don’t know it isn’t allowed. Once you have rules and guidelines, you need to enforce them in a consistent and professional manner. This is a huge area, and I would recommend people pick up Patrick O’Keefe’s book ‘Managing Online Forums‘ for more advice.

9. Do you have any thoughts on the tying together of multiple communities? For example, imagine a site which has a blog, a forum, a twitter account and an e-newsletter. What’s the best way of cross-promoting these? Is it better to get different sets of users for each, or to try and get people involved in more than one aspect?

It depends. If the blog, forum, twitter account etc are based on the same niche and share the same members, then it doesn’t make any sense to keep them separate. This is something I grappled with on Just Chat – we have separate sections to the site, namely chat rooms, forums and an email penpals section. You should leverage your existing traffic and brand loyalty as much as you can – keep everything together, if possible. Why create more work for yourself by building separate communities that consist largely of the same members or target audience?

10. Search Engine Optimisation is a lot about building relationships, often through the medium of linking! Can you offer any advice to link builders out there about creating and sustaining these kind of relationships?

SEO isn’t really my area of expertise, so I don’t like to offer advice on this area – instead, I prefer to refer people to companies like Distilled! Networking and relationship building is important though, regardless of whether you are developing an online community or a static website. I have always considered the most valuable element of link exchanges to be the relationship you develop with others who work in your niche or area of expertise. You can never know too many people. Your competitors are one of your greatest assets – you can learn from them and be motivated by them.

When networking or building relationships, you should be honest. You should be professional, and you should be generous – name drop, offer your time and you’ll find most people will reciprocate.


Thanks again Martin- some great answers in there.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

Practical Tips for Online Reputation Management: #1 - Hide your referer keywords

By: Rob

Executive Summary: You can configure Firefox to hide your referer string (aka: referrer string), which - amongst other benefits - helps to mask any suggestive Google searches you may have done to probe a site.

Covering the Footprints in the Sand

When analysing other websites from an Online Reputation perspective, I usually want to know a variety of different things about the site, and about Google’s opinion of pages in that site. Questions might include “Which pages about my client are most visible?” or “When did the site first mention a new product?

Conceivably you might even need to know:

Which pages, published in the last three months, mention a competitor and have received more than one comment, but don’t also mention my client’s new product?

This means that over a short period, I can make dozens of searches, and then visit three or four of the pages that appear in each of the results.

The owners of the target website will be able to check their server logs, and see exactly which keywords have referred them traffic; some of these can be a dead giveaway if someone is checking the site for ORM issues. For example, seeing that someone had been searching for these would set bells ringing:

  • site:reviewsite.com “brand name”
  • site:reviewsite.com “brand name” inurl:complaints
  • etc…

Whaddya Gonna Do About It?

Fortunately, it’s not hard to prevent your browser from passing the referer string (and hence search phrases) to the site. Just work your way through this little checklist:

1 - Go out and get a proper browser

Firefox 3

2 - In the Firefox browser bar, type about:config

about-config

3 - Yes, this may ‘void’ your ‘warranty’. If a warning message pops up, just ‘promise to be careful’

Here Be Dragons!

4 - In the ‘Filter’ box, type ‘referer’

5 - You’ll see the line named ‘network.http.sendRefererHeader

referer

6 - Double click the line to bring up the dialog box, enter 0 and click ‘OK’

change value

7 - Check to see that Firefox isn’t passing your referer string by clicking through to this referer checking page, and ensure that the first line is blank.

(There’s more information about network.http.sendRefererHeader - and a warning that some sites might not work correctly after changing it - at the Mozillazine Knowledge Base)

Browse Anonymously

You’re all done now, and can happily probe away without revealing your search keywords to webmasters. If you come up against any sites that don’t function correctly, then just repeat the steps above and change the number ‘0′ back to ‘2′.

I’ve presumptuously named this post as the first part in a series. I’ll carry on trying to post practical ORM tips, but I’m open to suggestions - so drop a comment if there’s something you’d like covered.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

 
infographic-tools